AR and VR projects usually succeed or fail on a decision made in week one: which device the experience runs on, and whether the user has to install anything to reach it. Get that wrong and an excellent build reaches nobody. TechEsperto develops augmented and virtual reality applications for training, product visualization, retail, and field operations across phones, tablets, and headsets, with the distribution route settled before production begins. If you have a use case and no clear view on platform, that is exactly the conversation to start with.
mobile app development work.
We scope immersive projects around the outcome and the audience’s device reality, since a training simulation for fifty staff and a customer-facing try-on experience have almost nothing in common technically. The applications below reflect what enterprises, manufacturers, retailers, and training providers most often ask us to build, delivered as standalone experiences or integrated with existing systems.
Procedural training with guided steps, assessment, and scoring, built so performance data flows into your learning or compliance systems rather than staying inside the headset.
Placement of products in the customer’s own space at true scale, or virtual try-on for wearables, delivered through your app or the mobile browser depending on reach requirements.
Explorable spaces for property, retail, and showroom use, with interaction points, configuration options, and enquiry capture built into the experience rather than bolted on.
Step-by-step overlays, equipment information, and remote expert annotation for technicians, designed for use with gloves, poor lighting, and intermittent connectivity.
Shared virtual spaces for design review, planning, and distributed collaboration, with synchronized state and voice for multiple participants in one environment.
Marketing and product experiences delivered through a link with no installation, which is usually the right choice for campaign reach and measurable customer-facing use.
Immersive applications are judged on comfort, stability, and whether the interaction feels obvious without instruction. Tracking quality, frame rate, and interaction design decide whether users complete the experience or abandon it in the first minute. The capabilities below are the ones that carry that weight, and we build them in rather than treating them as polish at the end.
Plane detection, occlusion handling, and persistent anchors so virtual objects stay convincingly placed as the user moves, which is the main determinant of perceived quality in AR.
Asset budgets, level of detail, and rendering optimization tuned to hold stable frame rates, since dropped frames in VR produce discomfort rather than a minor visual issue.
Gaze, controller, hand tracking, and touch interactions designed to be discoverable without a tutorial, because immersive users do not read instructions before starting.
Completion, accuracy, and timing captured and exported to learning or compliance systems, which is what turns a training experience into an auditable record.
Shared session state, voice, and presence for collaborative use, with network handling designed for the latency conditions of real corporate networks.
Seated modes, movement alternatives, subtitling, and intensity settings, which broaden who can actually use the experience across a workforce or customer base.
Immersive projects need feasibility settled early, because device capability and asset availability determine what is achievable more than budget does. We prototype the core interaction before committing to full production, so you experience the central mechanic on the target hardware before the expensive content work begins. Each stage has a named deliverable and device testing throughout.
We define the audience, their devices, the distribution route, and the outcome, then recommend AR or VR and a target platform rather than assuming the brief’s initial framing.
Storyboarding and interaction design specific to immersive contexts, covering user comfort, session length, and what happens when someone does the unexpected.
Assessment of existing CAD or product models, optimization for real-time rendering, and production of missing assets, which is usually the largest cost component.
A working prototype of the core interaction tested on the actual devices, because an experience that feels right on a development machine can fail on a standalone headset.
Iterative build with regular device testing, followed by distribution through app stores, enterprise device management, or the web depending on the route chosen.
Ongoing support covering device and platform updates, content additions, and compatibility work, since headset firmware and engine versions change on their own schedule.
AR and VR cost is driven mainly by 3D content: how many assets are needed, whether usable models already exist, and how much interaction the experience contains. A single-product WebAR experience is a modest engagement. A multi-scenario training simulation with assessment and reporting is considerably larger. We produce an itemized estimate after the platform assessment, and our portfolio shows the range of work we deliver.
A short fixed-price engagement building the core interaction on target hardware, so you can evaluate the experience before committing to full content production.
A defined experience with agreed scenarios, assets, and platforms, delivered against milestones and acceptance criteria set before production begins.
A named team for programs with multiple experiences or continuous content additions, billed monthly, which suits training libraries built out over time.
Platform compatibility work, content additions, and performance maintenance, scoped monthly so builds keep working as devices and engine versions change.
Our work and story have been picked up by news outlets and databases worldwide.
As featured on
Cost is driven mainly by 3D content: asset count, whether usable CAD or product models exist already, and interaction depth. A single-product WebAR experience is far smaller than a multi-scenario training simulation with assessment. We estimate after platform assessment.
A focused WebAR or single-scenario experience typically takes a few months. Multi-scenario training builds take longer, with asset production rather than engineering usually setting the timeline. We prototype the core interaction early to reduce that risk.
It depends on reach. Headsets suit trained internal users with managed devices. Phone AR suits customers who already have your app. WebAR reaches anyone with a link and no install, which usually wins for customer-facing campaigns.
Unity for most AR and VR work, Unreal where visual fidelity carries the experience, ARKit and ARCore for native mobile AR, and WebXR with Three.js or Babylon.js for browser-delivered experiences requiring no installation.
Yes. Completion, accuracy, and timing data can be exported to learning management or compliance systems, which is what turns an immersive training experience into an auditable record rather than an isolated activity.
Yes. Headset firmware, store policies, and engine versions change on their own schedule, so builds need compatibility work to keep running. Support retainers cover that alongside content additions and performance maintenance.
Tell us what you want people to be able to do, who they are, and what devices they have. We will come back within one business day with a recommendation on AR or VR, the right platform, and what a proof of concept would involve. Book a free consultation through ourcontact page.
Tell us what you’re building. Our team will get back to you within one business day with a clear, no-obligation plan.
